Levy & Nau P.C.  attorneys at law
  • Home
  • About
  • Client Information
  • Links
  • Law From The Ground Up
  • Contact

Property Rights vs. the Right Thing to Do

1/21/2016

0 Comments

 
A disturbing decision was just issued by the Appellate Division of New York’s Supreme Court. In an effort to return an already-evicted tenant to his apartment, the court held, in effect, that the landlord was required to lend the tenant money at zero interest.

The case, Lafayette Boynton Housing Corp. v. Pickett, involved a disabled man subsisting on social security. He had lived in his Bronx apartment for some 30 years. In 2011 the landlord started eviction proceedings for non-payment of rent. At that time the tenant owed $5,200 in arrears.

Over the next two years the tenant and his legal aid attorney he convinced a housing court judge to stay the warrant of eviction seven different times, based on promises to pay the arrears. By the time the tenant paid any arrears, however, he owed even more, because he was not paying his current rent each month. So the arrears kept climbing higher, and the promises to pay kept coming.

Finally, in 2013 the housing court refused to give the tenant any more chances, and the eviction went forward. A full month after the tenant was out of the apartment, he got additional public assistance and grant money and paid the judgment amount to the landlord. The full amount at that time, including the landlord’s legal fees, was $14,000.

Based on that payment, the housing court ordered the landlord to take the tenant back and to reinstate him into his old apartment. The Appellate Division upheld the lower court, noting that the tenant had made a good faith attempt to cure the arrears, and that it wasn’t the tenant’s fault that couldn’t pay up on time. It is not clear from the decision whose fault the judges thought it was.

Justice David Saxe, in a written dissenting opinion, said that the court’s majority decision “forces landlords to serve as de facto no-interest lenders to low-income tenants.” Justice Saxe also suggested that the housing court’s decision to give the tenant relief even after the warrant of eviction was executed went beyond the authority given by the applicable law (Section 749(3) of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, which only allows relief from eviction “for good cause shown” before the warrant of eviction is executed.)

Maybe this decision was inevitable. Anyone and everyone would want to help an elderly disabled person living on social security. But there is great danger in letting emotion go too far in applying the law. The law is supposed to be objective and impartial. Emotion is never objective or impartial. Do we want a society where rules are applied evenly and predictably? Or do we want a society where rules depend on how our judges, executives and police feel when they get up in the morning? All I can do is ask the question.
0 Comments

Getting Ahead with Reverse Mortgages

1/2/2016

0 Comments

 
Reverse mortgages, like any other tool, can be very useful if you know how to use them. There are big differences from regular mortgages, and you need to know those differences to make the right choices.

Let’s start with what is the same. A reverse mortgage is still a mortgage. A mortgage is what gives your lender the right to take your property in foreclosure if you don’t pay back a loan in accordance with your promissory note. The promissory note creates the debt. The mortgage connects the debt to your property. That part is the same with a reverse mortgage. You sign a promissory note, which creates a debt. Then you sign a mortgage, which ties the debt to your property.

Next we’ll look at the differences that make reverse mortgages such a powerful financial tool.

Your credit score doesn’t matter.
It doesn’t matter how good or bad your credit score is. The primary factor is your age.  The youngest person on the deed to your house must be at least 62 years old. If that’s true, you are eligible. The only other tests for eligibility are whether or not you are delinquent on any kind of Federal government debt (income tax, for example) and whether or not you can afford to pay your real estate taxes and other home-related expenses.

Most property types qualify.
If you live in a one to four family house, your property qualifies. Most condominiums and certain “manufactured” homes will qualify too, but co-op apartments and mixed-use buildings will not. Those restrictions come from the Federal government (HUD and FHA), not from the banks.

No payments during your lifetime.
Now here is the fun part: you don’t have to pay the money back as long as you live in your house. Typically the money is paid back by your estate after your passing.

Flexibility.
Reverse mortgages are very flexible. You can use the money for anything whatsoever. (You do have to pay off any existing mortgage as part of your closing, however). You can take the money in an up-front sump sum, or in the form of monthly payments from the bank to you. You can even take a reverse mortgage as a line of credit, just like a conventional home-equity line of credit (HELOC). Unlike a HELOC, however, any money you take does not have to be paid back until you are no longer in the home.

Most people want to know up front how much of their home equity they can tap through a reverse mortgage. The answer depends on your age (the higher the age, the higher the percentage of home value you can get), on the value of your property, and on what current interest rates are doing. The government has set a maximum reverse mortgage amount of $625,000 as of this writing. There are many reverse mortgage calculators online that will tell you how much you can qualify for. You plug in your age, home value and address, and the amount will be calculated for you. One that I like can be found at www.bitly.com/MorCalc.

Despite all the advantages for senior homeowners, reverse mortgages are not the right financial tool for all situations. For that reason, the government requires you to speak to a HUD-certified counselor before you proceed. As always, get independent legal advice before signing any papers that affect your money or your property.

0 Comments
    follow us in feedly

    Roger Levy

    Brooklyn-based attorney and pilot.

    Picture
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    April 2020
    March 2020
    December 2019
    June 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    July 2017
    January 2017
    September 2016
    June 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Decedents
    Estates
    Surrogate's Court
    Wills

Real Estate Transactions 
Commercial Litigation & Property Disputes 
Probate and Estate Administration 
Surrogate's Court Proceedings and Contested Matters 

Foreclosure Defense & Mortgage Loan Workouts 
Bankruptcy 
Business Formation & Continuity

Main Office:                                               854 Fulton Street                        
Brooklyn NY 11238                                                                       
Telephone 718-622-8150
​Toll-Free 844-LEVY-LAW
Fax 718-622-8152
Copyright: Levy & Nau P.C. 2014