There is a scene in the Three Stooges 1944 short film Gents Without Cents where Moe’s angry and violent outburst against anyone within range is triggered by the straight man’s utterance of the phrase “Niagara Falls”. It is a classic Vaudeville bit that has been performed by countless performers in decades past.
In the scene, after hearing the fateful words, Moe’s eyes glaze over as he remembers a traumatic incident. “Slowly I turned,” he says to no one in particular, “step by step, inch by inch.” He re-enacts his past encounter with the man who did him wrong, and delivers his physical vengeance upon the nearest innocent target who is an unwilling, and unwitting, stand-in for Moe’s nemesis.
Now, a Housing Court judge has essentially allowed a violent tenant to avoid eviction using a similar excuse.
In a holdover case just decided, Alice and Trixie were tenants, living in public housing with their kids. (Names have been changed.)
The kids were playing outside their apartment building. Trouble followed when Alice and Trixie got into an argument, and then a physical fight. The police were called. Alice was arrested and charged with criminal harassment. Trixie got an order of protection against Alice.
Trixie told the police that she was OK, but the next day, two bruises appeared on her face. The Housing Authority was notified, and sought to evict Alice on the ground that she violated her lease by engaging in criminal activity that threatened the health, safety or peaceful enjoyment of another tenant.
Alice protested that she had been provoked, that she had special circumstances that explained her violent reaction, and she was sorry. The Housing Authority refused to give Alice a second chance, and started a holdover proceeding against her.
Trixie’s Testimony at the Trial
Trixie testified that her son, playing outside on a hot day, asked her for a drink. Alice became angry for no good reason. Trixie explained to Alice that there was no reason to be upset; it was only a drink on a hot day.
According to Trixie, Alice called her fat and cursed at her. Trixie, not wiling to let the insult go unanswered, then said, to no one in particular, “I’d rather be fat than a ho.” Alice then physically assaulted Trixie.
Alice’s Testimony
Alice testified that when Trixie called her daughter a bad name, she, Alice, went into mama-bear mode and began swearing and insulting Trixie. Alice admitted that when Trixie called her a whore, a switch flipped and Alice did physically attack Trixie. Alice said she reacted like that, and “lost it”, because she is sensitive about being called a whore; she was raped at age 14, and the rapist kept calling her a whore throughout the horrific episode.
Ever since the rape, said Alice, she has had serious anger issues. She testified that she is undergoing psychiatric care for intermittent explosive disorder, and just before the incident, she changed medications. Before the new medication kicked in, she was susceptible to angry outbursts. Alice admitted that she was wrong to punch Trixie, and she apologized.
The Rest of the Story
Another tenant, Carmen, who was not involved in this crisis, also testified. Carmen said that the children were playing in a rowdy manner. Trixie yelled at the children inappropriately. Alice intervened and engaged Trixie verbally. Trixie retreated, but Alice ran after Trixie and assaulted her, whereupon the police were called in.
The Lawyers
Alice’s lawyer argued that their client recognized that she did something bad, that she was sorry, that she has issues, and she deserves a second chance. Eviction is a consequence so disproportionate to her offense, in light of all the circumstances, that it is shocking to one’s sense of fairness.
The Housing Authority’s lawyer said that the lease rules. Alice promised not to commit a crime that harms another tenant. That is sufficient to terminate her lease. Alice is a “tinder box” and the physical violence against Trixie crossed a line that makes Alice unsuitable for public housing.
The Judge
The judge did not believe Trixie’s version of the events. He mostly believed Carmen, who was not involved. The judge ruled that Alice did wrongfully hit Trixie, and did breach her lease covenant not to engage in criminal activity.
If the lease was the only source of rights between Alice and the Housing Authority, the Authority could terminate Alice’s lease. But there is more. There is the Federal Section 8 voucher program, which gives tenants additional rights. If you take Section 8 as a landlord, you can only terminate a tenancy for serious or repeated violation of the material terms of the lease.
“Shocking to fairness” is a phrase that has no precise standards. Compassion for the tenant cannot be a substitute for dispassionate legal analysis. The court cannot consider the fact that public housing is a last resort for most tenants, or that eviction might result in homelessness. Committing a crime against a person or property comes with the presumption that eviction is a reasonable remedy. But that might change with mitigating factors.
Mitigating factors can include provocation, self-defense and reduced mental state.
Here, after Trixie insulted the children, Alice became agitated but only reacted with insults and not a physical attack. Trixie, for her part, instead of backing off, escalated the matter by calling Alice a whore. These were fighting words, which, by their very utterance, tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
Although no provocative act, insult or word, without an overt act of hostility, will justify an assault, the provocation mitigates the degree of culpability. Here, Alice exercised self-restraint until she was triggered by a word that invoked the horrible nightmare of her rape. This triggering happened at the moment that she was changing medications, which made her vulnerable to rage.
The Housing Authority’s concerns about Alice were reasonable, but Alice is working on her issues. She is seeking treatment from multiple doctors for her anger issues. If Alice violates the order of protection, she will face consequences in the criminal justice system.
The Result
The Court took the position that all this was really Trixie’s fault for provoking Alice and triggering Alice with the exact word the rapist used. All that, together with the temporary biochemical imbalance caused by the medication switch, the continuing medical treatment and the order of protection, make eviction grossly disproportionate.
The court's decision does not indicate whether Trixie actually knew, or had any reason to know, that Alice once was raped, or was on psychiatric medication, or was under medical care, or had an explosive temper, or lost all control upon hearing the word "whore". Whether or not Trixie knew any of this, or had reason to know, was not important to the Court.
And so the landlord's petition was dismissed. Tenant Alice won the right to stay. Watch your back, Trixie.
In the scene, after hearing the fateful words, Moe’s eyes glaze over as he remembers a traumatic incident. “Slowly I turned,” he says to no one in particular, “step by step, inch by inch.” He re-enacts his past encounter with the man who did him wrong, and delivers his physical vengeance upon the nearest innocent target who is an unwilling, and unwitting, stand-in for Moe’s nemesis.
Now, a Housing Court judge has essentially allowed a violent tenant to avoid eviction using a similar excuse.
In a holdover case just decided, Alice and Trixie were tenants, living in public housing with their kids. (Names have been changed.)
The kids were playing outside their apartment building. Trouble followed when Alice and Trixie got into an argument, and then a physical fight. The police were called. Alice was arrested and charged with criminal harassment. Trixie got an order of protection against Alice.
Trixie told the police that she was OK, but the next day, two bruises appeared on her face. The Housing Authority was notified, and sought to evict Alice on the ground that she violated her lease by engaging in criminal activity that threatened the health, safety or peaceful enjoyment of another tenant.
Alice protested that she had been provoked, that she had special circumstances that explained her violent reaction, and she was sorry. The Housing Authority refused to give Alice a second chance, and started a holdover proceeding against her.
Trixie’s Testimony at the Trial
Trixie testified that her son, playing outside on a hot day, asked her for a drink. Alice became angry for no good reason. Trixie explained to Alice that there was no reason to be upset; it was only a drink on a hot day.
According to Trixie, Alice called her fat and cursed at her. Trixie, not wiling to let the insult go unanswered, then said, to no one in particular, “I’d rather be fat than a ho.” Alice then physically assaulted Trixie.
Alice’s Testimony
Alice testified that when Trixie called her daughter a bad name, she, Alice, went into mama-bear mode and began swearing and insulting Trixie. Alice admitted that when Trixie called her a whore, a switch flipped and Alice did physically attack Trixie. Alice said she reacted like that, and “lost it”, because she is sensitive about being called a whore; she was raped at age 14, and the rapist kept calling her a whore throughout the horrific episode.
Ever since the rape, said Alice, she has had serious anger issues. She testified that she is undergoing psychiatric care for intermittent explosive disorder, and just before the incident, she changed medications. Before the new medication kicked in, she was susceptible to angry outbursts. Alice admitted that she was wrong to punch Trixie, and she apologized.
The Rest of the Story
Another tenant, Carmen, who was not involved in this crisis, also testified. Carmen said that the children were playing in a rowdy manner. Trixie yelled at the children inappropriately. Alice intervened and engaged Trixie verbally. Trixie retreated, but Alice ran after Trixie and assaulted her, whereupon the police were called in.
The Lawyers
Alice’s lawyer argued that their client recognized that she did something bad, that she was sorry, that she has issues, and she deserves a second chance. Eviction is a consequence so disproportionate to her offense, in light of all the circumstances, that it is shocking to one’s sense of fairness.
The Housing Authority’s lawyer said that the lease rules. Alice promised not to commit a crime that harms another tenant. That is sufficient to terminate her lease. Alice is a “tinder box” and the physical violence against Trixie crossed a line that makes Alice unsuitable for public housing.
The Judge
The judge did not believe Trixie’s version of the events. He mostly believed Carmen, who was not involved. The judge ruled that Alice did wrongfully hit Trixie, and did breach her lease covenant not to engage in criminal activity.
If the lease was the only source of rights between Alice and the Housing Authority, the Authority could terminate Alice’s lease. But there is more. There is the Federal Section 8 voucher program, which gives tenants additional rights. If you take Section 8 as a landlord, you can only terminate a tenancy for serious or repeated violation of the material terms of the lease.
“Shocking to fairness” is a phrase that has no precise standards. Compassion for the tenant cannot be a substitute for dispassionate legal analysis. The court cannot consider the fact that public housing is a last resort for most tenants, or that eviction might result in homelessness. Committing a crime against a person or property comes with the presumption that eviction is a reasonable remedy. But that might change with mitigating factors.
Mitigating factors can include provocation, self-defense and reduced mental state.
Here, after Trixie insulted the children, Alice became agitated but only reacted with insults and not a physical attack. Trixie, for her part, instead of backing off, escalated the matter by calling Alice a whore. These were fighting words, which, by their very utterance, tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
Although no provocative act, insult or word, without an overt act of hostility, will justify an assault, the provocation mitigates the degree of culpability. Here, Alice exercised self-restraint until she was triggered by a word that invoked the horrible nightmare of her rape. This triggering happened at the moment that she was changing medications, which made her vulnerable to rage.
The Housing Authority’s concerns about Alice were reasonable, but Alice is working on her issues. She is seeking treatment from multiple doctors for her anger issues. If Alice violates the order of protection, she will face consequences in the criminal justice system.
The Result
The Court took the position that all this was really Trixie’s fault for provoking Alice and triggering Alice with the exact word the rapist used. All that, together with the temporary biochemical imbalance caused by the medication switch, the continuing medical treatment and the order of protection, make eviction grossly disproportionate.
The court's decision does not indicate whether Trixie actually knew, or had any reason to know, that Alice once was raped, or was on psychiatric medication, or was under medical care, or had an explosive temper, or lost all control upon hearing the word "whore". Whether or not Trixie knew any of this, or had reason to know, was not important to the Court.
And so the landlord's petition was dismissed. Tenant Alice won the right to stay. Watch your back, Trixie.
